Platform · Carbon Governance
When the factors update, your baseline should not quietly change.
Every year the UK GHG Conversion Factors are republished, and in most estates last year's numbers silently move. Comparisons break. Baselines drift. Nobody notices until assurance. Sustainify AI pins every factor set to its reporting period and locks the period closed.
Baseline · FY 2023/24 · Scope 1 and 2
As published, 12 Jul 2024
2,410.0
The same period, read back today
2,494.4
What told you?
- Email alertnone sent
- Change logno entry
- Report footnoteunchanged
- Version historyone version
The number moved. Nothing else did.
Settings · data & factors · emission factors
Data & factors · Settings
Emission Factors
The published conversion-factor library your calculations resolve against, organised by year and source.
Scope 3 under-reported, this factor set is missing 2 required cascade partners.
Entries for the categories below resolve their primary factor but silently drop the linked Scope 3 row, so their emissions are understated. Import the missing factors, or add them as custom factors, to close the gap.
- t_and_d_wtt , needed by uk_electricity
- wtt_fuels , needed by fuels/natural_gas
Factor sets
Recalculate emissionsUK DEFRA GHG 2025
DEFRA
UK DEFRA GHG 2024
DEFRA
UK DEFRA GHG 2023
DEFRA
| Description | Category | Scope | Factor (kgCO2e) | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity generated, UK grid average Location-based | uk_electricity | Scope 2 | 0.01830 | kWh |
Transmission and distribution, UK grid | t_and_d | Scope 3 | 0.00171 | kWh |
Well-to-tank, electricity generation | wtt_uk_electricity | Scope 3 | 0.00382 | kWh |
Natural gas Gaseous fuels | fuels | Scope 1 | 0.18290 | kWhGross CV |
Natural gas Gaseous fuels | fuels | Scope 1 | 0.20267 | kWhNet CV |
Vans, average (up to 3.5 tonnes), diesel | delivery_vehicles | Scope 1 | 0.24191 | km |
Flights, long haul, economy class | business_travel_air | Scope 3 | 0.14787 | passenger.km+RF |
Showing 1–7 of 6,281
Page 1 of 315
Four layers of governance.
Factor versioning.
Every factor carries a version reference, an effective date and a source attribution. When the UK GHG factors update, historical periods remain locked, so your year-on-year comparisons stay valid.
Period locking.
Once a reporting period is closed, no calculation can be silently altered. Every change is timestamped and tamper-evident.
Calculation lineage.
Full lineage from report to scope to building to activity to factor to evidence. Auditors and assurance teams can follow the whole path without interrogating spreadsheets or contacting your team.
Audit export.
Complete audit lineage, exported on demand. ISO 14064 compatible.
Unpinned
FY22/23
GHG 2022
GHG 2025
FY23/24
GHG 2023
GHG 2025
FY24/25
GHG 2024
GHG 2025
FY25/26
GHG 2025
GHG 2025
Pinned to the period
FY22/23
GHG 2022
clamped
FY23/24
GHG 2023
clamped
FY24/25
GHG 2024
clamped
FY25/26
GHG 2025
open
Questions
Carbon governance, answered
What is carbon data governance?
The controls that make a reported emissions figure reproducible: the factor version pinned to the period that used it, the period locked when it closes, the calculation recorded rather than recomputed, and a trace from the figure back to its source. It is the layer beneath reporting, not a reporting feature.
What is factor pinning?
Storing which conversion factor set, at which publisher revision, priced each figure, so the figure keeps the factors in force for its period. Without it, republishing the annual factors silently restates prior years, and the first person to notice is usually an auditor comparing this year’s pack against last year’s.
What does locking a period do?
It closes the reporting period so figures inside it cannot change without an explicit, recorded restatement. Late data arriving against a closed period is held for review rather than absorbed silently, which is what makes a prior-year comparison trustworthy.
What happens if no factor set exists for a reporting year?
The calculation fails rather than borrowing another year’s factors. An interim set carries a label that travels into every trace and citation produced from it, so a figure priced with provisional factors is identifiable as such wherever it appears.
How is this different from a carbon accounting dashboard?
A dashboard presents figures; governance determines whether they hold up when questioned. Most carbon software handles one scope at a time and leaves the joining, the versioning and the evidence to you. The distinction only becomes visible under assurance, which is also the worst time to discover it.
Does governance slow reporting down?
It moves the work earlier. Recording provenance as data arrives takes longer than importing it unchecked, and it removes the reconstruction exercise that otherwise happens under deadline when somebody asks how a number was produced.
When your auditor asks how a number was produced, the answer is a single click.
Not a week of reconstruction. Not an email to the person who built the model. The report value, the scope, the building, the activity record, the factor version, the run ID and the evidence, in one export.